Tuesday, May 21, 2019
Mw Petroleum
Discounted Cash Flow Valuation of Aggregate militia Discounted Cash Flow Valuation Proved Developed Reserves Discounted Cash Flow Valuation Proved Un true Reserves Discounted Cash Flow Valuation Probable Reserves Discounted Cash Flow Valuation attainable Reserves Question 3 To value MW Petroleum we would consider the assets in place and the option bearing assets discretely. The assets in place consist of the proved intermited militia since they are already producing a determinable quantity of oil and natural gas, as well as the non-producing assets as if developed immediately ( valued as the NPV of free cash flows).The expenditures associated with the proved developed reserves are also known with some certainty since they consist primarily of maintenance and replacement cost that follow experience based norms. The NPV is subject to commodity charge chance due to volatility in oil and gas prices, as well as uncertainty regarding the discount rate. The options consist of th e delay in developing proved undeveloped, probable and possible reserves. In the case of these assets, significant development costs must(prenominal) be incurred to monetize the reserves.In the case of the probable and possible reserves, the estimated cash flows are already risk weighted to account for the uncertainty in producible reserves. The options on these reserves are timing options. By incorporating volatility in commodity prices oer time, Apache can value the ability to postpone capital expenditures to develop the reserves until volatility in commodity prices returns to historical levels. It is important that Apache have some level of certainty regarding minimum likely commodity prices over time since these are long-lived projects.These options yield a higher value than the DCF valuation (of the aggregate cash flows). Since we are considering these reserves as potential projects in years basketball team through seven, we use the Black-Scholes model to value the options. T he option values are inclusive of the project, i. e. not just the option alone. Question 4 The assets underlying the options are quite risky as demonstrated by the rising volatility presented in the case.Since Apache was primarily concerned with the oil assets, we used the highest recent oil price volatility of 50%. Since volatility is such a driver of option value, we also performed a sensitivity analysis to evaluate how the projects plus options would be valued at different revenue levels as well as with differing volatility. Question 5 Based on the value of all the call options derived in dubiousness 4, if the sale goes through then Apache Corporation would not exercise any of the options early.In doing so, they would incur significant financial hardship while bearing the risk of highly volatile underlying assets. Given the potential financial strain of this acquisition, as incorporated by the cost of capital, Apache would benefit from observing prices develop over time. Our ans wer is based on the volatility which is assumed at 50%. Based on the sensitivity analysis it does not appear Apache would attempt to develop the possible reserves within the 5-7 year timeframe.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.